347-878-3837

Business

Here are articles on Business

So how many online communities do we really need?

A friend invited me to yet another social networking site. Now I’m on MySpace, Friendster, LinkedIn, Doostang, Gather, and probably a few others I can’t remember off the top of my head.

So when is enough enough, already? Simply filling out all those online profiles could be a full-time job. I’m beseiged with invitations, and I’m dutifully beseiging all my friends with invitations, but to what end?

Next month, I’m launching a podcast with the goal of making it into the iTunes top 100. That will be the real test. I’m going to see if all these much-vaunted networks (my network now includes more people than currently live on the face of the planet) can actually produce a tangible result and get people to go download my podcast. … or are they all just another form of mental masturbation, an excuse not to get on and actually have a life, but rather sit nearly motionless in front of a computer pretending that my virtual community actually has 5% the value, depth, and community of a real, satisfying life.

I’ll let you know how it goes.

When you define life as war, you get hurt.

Wow. Walking through the airport, I saw a sign:

Shell Oil says: When Mother Nature doesn’t back down, we have experts up to her challenge.

Think about that framing! Shudder. That’s the framing of extinction. Mother Nature, dear Shell Oil, is what gives us life. Food. Clothes. Even *gasp* oil.

Maybe we are, indeed, at war with Mother Nature. If so, it’s a war we can only lose. She’ll win. Can you say “Global warming?” Species extinction? Honey Bees?

The engineers aren’t up to those challenges, just yet. Especially in a country where Gallup reported today that 68% of Repubs and 40% of Dems/Indeps don’t believe in evolution, I don’t have high hopes that we’ll be leading innovation into solving world problems 20 years from now. Though we might still be drilling oil.

American Express usury highlights an economic culture gone very, very wrong.

Today’s project: apply for a “Get travel points” American Express card and cancel my generic American Express card. The whole experience was an eye-opener. But apparently only to me. It points to a company gone sadly wrong, and even worse, a culture dissolving.

The company’s losing it

Twenty years ago, Amex was famous for customer service. No longer. They still think so. They said five times during my call that their goal was to provide “world class customer service.” They should have stopped telling me and done it instead. Every new person and computer they transferred me to made me verify my card# and security info. Huh? Can’t their computers transfer the info? Maybe not. After all, IT is notoriously hard.

But the people stuff isn’t. All told, they made me sit through ten minutes (no exaggeration) of disclaimers and policy disclosures to apply for a card I already had, even after I asked them to stop. At least the rep read it in a monotone so fast it was almost gibberish (wish I could say she was trying to be humorous. Nope. She was just robotic.) Then they wouldn’t let me cancel the old card without another ten minutes of trying to convince me not to cancel. Bizarre, since I was just switching cards. Even after telling her several times I was in a hurry and wished to cancel, she had to go through her whole script. World class customer service? Hardly. They have a long way to go to make it to “mediocre,” much less anything approaching “world class.”

America is losing it

Amex’s incompetence was nothing compared to the underlying policies, however. Their underlying policies are atrocious, but what’s even worse is that we don’t even blink when we hear them. And that’s what’s really scary.

Halfway through my Application Drone’s procedural monologue, she mentioned that if I stop payment, the interest rate jumps to over 30%. Huh? How does that make sense? I’m in severe financial trouble. I can’t make my credit card payments. So their solution is to hike the interest rate to an unbelievably usurious level, this guaranteeing I’ll never be able to catch up on by debt and will simply fall into financial ruin.

Do they think the high interest rates will deter overspending? Absurd. Credit card companies partner with merchants to spend billions on ads convincing people to spend on their credit cards. The average American is financially illiterate when it comes to debt (see: Credit Card Debt, Housing Bubble, etc.). Does Amex think a footnote mentioning “prime plus 21%” will create financial responsibility in someone who watches a thousand ads daily, telling them that credit card spending is “priceless”? Right. Pull the other one. So banks can’t believe that usury serves the Greater Good of deterring overspending.

Maybe they think if they immediately up what’s owed to them, they’ll get more of the estate when their customer declares bankruptcy. Maybe, but we’re talking about average Americans. There won’t be much to divide. Besides, immediately putting someone further in debt at their first financial squeeze in anticipation of feeding off their carcass seems … distasteful.

What I don’t understand, and I really don’t understand it, is the utter lack of compassion. If a friend were in a tough situation, my first impulse would be to help them. To be there, to counsel them, to do what I could to help them pick up their lives and go on. And yes, I’d do that even if their problems were a result of their own bad decisions. That’s what it means to help someone. As a company, there’s no reason to put the screws to someone in trouble. But as a culture, we’ve come to the place where the worse off someone is, the more we jump in to grab the last few drops of blood (after all, it’s not like they have the money to defend themselves).

Who do we want to be?

Michael Moore asks in “Sicko” if we’ve become a nation without compassion. He suggests that when it comes to health care, the answer is “Yes.” I suggest when it comes to business, the answer is also “Yes.” I ask myself, “is this a world I would be proud to help create?” the answer is a resounding “No.” So-called Progress just isn’t worth it to me. iPhones, the Internet, HDTV… at the end of the day, those things just don’t replace living in a community that lifts us all up. No amount of “twittering” on my iPhone will ever replace caring. We’ve created an economy whose values oppose us, rather than nurture us. And in a head-on battle, I fear the winner will be the economy.

Have you seen Dove’s Campaign for Real Beauty?

I’ve totally internalized the media images of the Ideal Male Body. Abercrombie & Fitch, galore. So, in a very 21st-century way, I often feel inadequate with my body. Like every time I walk past a mirror. Especially in summer. The amazing thing is that we’ve created these images of beauty for marketing purposes, so people will feel inadequate and will buy our products in some gut-level attempt to capture that beauty. It works.

Today a friend passed me a link to Dove’s Campaign for Real Beauty at http://www.campaignforrealbeauty.com. How refreshing! I especially like the video of the transformation from woman to Beauty.

It’s harder to be a hypocrite if you’re liberal, but not for any moral reasons…

I’m watching Congressman Vitter reporting back to work, after being exposed as a hypocrite, being a big proponent of the Sanctity of Marriage, despite having visited the DC Madame.

I was wondering why it always seems to be the Conservatives who ooze hypocrisy. Rev. Haggard, preaching hatred against gays while happily enjoying “massages” from a male escort (not to menton buying drugs. He claims, however, that he didn’t inhale). Congressman Foley chairing the anti-online-predator board while using Instant Messages to ask teenage congressional pages to describe themselves masturbating. Let’s not even consider the $600 million judgment against the Catholic Church for its systematic cover-up of child molestation. It almost seems epidemic.

Upon reflection, though, it isn’t. And I don’t believe it’s due to a moral failing intrinsic to social conservatism(*); it’s structural. Socially conservative positions are characterized by restricting behaviour. In short, “thou shalt not …” It’s easy to be a hypocrite when you preach against a certain behavior, just do the behavior.

Liberal positions are typically pemissive. “It’s your choice what to do in the privacy of your own home.” There’s no way to be hypocritical with a permissive stance, since it’s perfectly find to support someone’s right to do something and still not exercise that right itself. There are certainly ways in which a liberal position can create hypocrisy, as can be seen with the pro-alternative-energy Kennedys protesting the Cape Wind wind farm (it would alter the ocean view from their family mansions). But it’s less common, I believe, for the structural reason described above.

So if you want job security and the respect of your neighbors, take liberal social positions and you greatly reduce the chances of being labeled an accidental hypocrite.

(*) This should not be construed to mean that I believe social conservatives have moral positions, only that moral issues aren’t the root cause of the hypocrisy.

Collect some fan mail 🙂

I’m going to be working with an experienced PBS Producer on how to break into the media. Before we meet, she’s asked me to poll some colleagues as to what qualities make me stand out, and what they find special about me.

Being typical, non-emotional, task-oriented guy, I thought of this purely as a request for information. So I sent it out to about 30 people and promptly forgot it.

Then the responses came in. My reaction was anything but task-oriented. By the fifth or sixth message, I was crying (in a good way). I get so wrapped up in my own struggles (or perceived struggles) that my attention is always on where I’m falling short, what’s not working, where I’m not achieving or connecting or loving or doing or being. These messages really hammered home how I’m special, and how others perceive my great qualities.

If you’ve never asked your friends what they love about you, give it a try. It’s very, very powerful.

Hire that MySpacer with the sexy pictures. They just may know more than you.

Oh, man. I saw a query on PR newswire asking for experts on Job Dangers of MySpace. You see, your future employer is watching. That drunken picture of you will soon destroy your career. You’ll be broken at age 21. Defeat. Loss. Despair. You’ll end up in a gutter, covered in your own filth, drunkenly belching unspeakable gasses as your last few brain cells think, “If only I hadn’t posted that picture…”

I’m not sure who’s the stupid one here: the journalist? the companies? It’s certainly not the teenagers.

This is reality.

Look, people, MySpace, Friendster, Twitter, and the online world are here. They just are. And people post things that historically (pre-2003) would rarely have been shared publicly. That doesn’t mean they weren’t going on, only that we didn’t discuss them. Remember divorce, pre-marital sex, etc.? Once illegal, immoral, and hush-hush, now characters on TV lie in bed, steamy from orgasm, deciding whether to exchange first names. You can blame it on the secular humanists, or an erosion of values (whose? the conservative-owned media like FOX that produces and airs the stuff? that’s a fun twist!), but actually, the market—that’s us viewers—knows it’s real life, accepts it, and likes to watch.

This is irrelevant.

Any employer screening candidates based on a teenager’s MySpace page deserves to fail as more and more creative, capable, talented people go elsewhere. If you ran any business of 5 or more people and fired anyone who had ever done something foolish, you’d be working alone in a room. Until you re-read your own diary, that is, at which time you’d fire yourself. Chill out, people.

Employers think, “dumb teenage stunt means this person won’t be able to perform as an employee.” Hogwash. Racy MySpace pages don’t even show a lack of judgment, frankly. They show teenage judgment. What do you expect? Of course their judgment is different from adults. That’s why we call them “teenagers,” don’t let them drive without a permit, and won’t let them enter legally binding contracts until they’re 18. And they eventually grow up, developing skills, judgment, etc. Einstein failed classes in high school. Fortunately, some folks were willing to look past the teenager to see the adult.

And by the way, HR departments that think a 19-year-old’s drunken birthday party has anything to do with their ability to perform on the job are flat-out wrong. I’ve never heard of any study that showed that college partying, webcamming, or exhibitionist picture exchange affected job skills one iota (except the ability to market alcoholic beverages, in which case that background is a “plus”). If you are hiring a financial analyst, his goofy sophomore pictures are simply irrelevant. His financial analyst abilities and ability to behave at work are all that matters.

This is the future.

The piece that gets me the most is when all these self-righteous adults declare “These kids don’t know how the world works.” Au contraire. These adults don’t know how the world works. Teenagers do dumb things and these days, they put those things on web sites. That is how the world works. In ten years, the MySpace crowd will be at the hiring table. They’ll remember their public erotic escapades, foolish road trips, and bathroom barf pictures. They’ll remember the silly stuff all their friends did, too. And they’ll know, from first-hand experience, that having a public MySpace page is just part of being a 21st century teenager.

Maybe once they’re the hiring managers, they will ding anyone who doesn’t have a MySpace page. After all, someone who won’t show their full selves probably can’t be trusted. If a person pretends they’ve never done anything foolish, they’re obviously lying. And would someone of the MySpace generation really want to hire an aging liar? I don’t think so.

So relax, already, and enjoy your new employee, knowing that behind her prim-and-proper exterior lurks someone you really want planning your next holiday. Because unless she’s doing a lousy job at work, you’re free to ignore her MySpace page, even as she’s free to ignore your extra-marital affair. And yes, everyone knows about it, but they let you run your own life, and judge your work performance based on your merits.

Long-term Thinking: The Depopulation Problem

How much of our prosperity is driven by innovation, hard work, productivity, yada, yada, yada, and how much is simple demographics?

The Long Now is an organization that encourages long-term thinking. The have free seminars about long-term perspectives. I just finished listening to The Depopulation Problem. The author talks through many economic and social issues, all related to fertility rates and the aging population.

The speaker makes some fairly eye-opening observations. For example, demographically, religious fundamentalists tend to have larger families. Does that mean the population of 2050 will be more fundamentalist than we are now? He extrapolates to some pretty outrageous scenarios, but the basic issue is worth a listen. As fertility rates drop and lifespans lengthen, there are more and more old people for every productive young person. So at the end of the day (or the lifetime), the working population has to work longer and harder just to support the old people, leaving a lower standard of living for the middle classes.

Give a listen. It’s an important issue and, by definition, it will become an issue during our lifetimes.